Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of webdoublefx@hotmail.com
 designates 65.55.111.91 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <BLU162-ds7C4BEDFF03EBA0507AFD6B4480@phx.gbl>
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_THOMAS?= <webdoublefx@hotmail.com>
To: <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
References: <CCEB730E.49CD3%aharui@adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: <CCEB730E.49CD3%aharui@adobe.com>
Subject: Re: CONFIG::performanceInstrumentation / PerfUtil?
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 03:46:05 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Importance: Normal

PerfSubmitter probably talks to an Adobe thing and I'm pretty sure that's 
private too but I'd like to be able to develop the same class without doing 
a war with Adobe's legals, that's my point.

-----Message d'origine----- 
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 8:07 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: CONFIG::performanceInstrumentation / PerfUtil?


On 12/10/12 10:00 AM, "Fr�d�ric THOMAS" <webdoublefx@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> I think it was a plug-in that fed results to a reporting infrastructure.
> I'm not so sure we need it but we could try to get it donated.
>
> I comeback on that because it would be nice to be able to test the perfs 
> on
> parts of the framework but I noticed that not all the framework/tests
> directory has been donated and notably, the performance one.
>
> Will it be donated ?
We can look into it, but I'm not sure it is worth the effort.  I think it
plugged into a server-based reporting infrastructure that we have no way to
replicate in Apache, and it certainly didn't catch some of the issues that
folks are trying to fix now, plus performance on individual machines varies
widely.


-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui