Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 4
From: Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com>
In-Reply-To: <CCF63403.4A31D%aharui@adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 10:36:48 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B2BE7E14-51EF-4149-956F-F7692A05EF1B@classsoftware.com>
References: <CCF63403.4A31D%aharui@adobe.com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org

Hi,

> I don't really have an opinion other than I think the FP and AIR SDKs =
should
> use the same swf-version.

The issue here is do we really want to default to FP 11.4 by default for =
non AIR projects? I can see there would be some complaints (from users) =
if we forced an update from FP 11.1 to 11.4. The SDK is not using any =
features from 11.2+ so I don't think we should force people to upgrade =
by default. I'd assume that people who use AIR are used to playing about =
with swf versions as support in the IDEs generally lags behind AIR =
releases.

Thanks,
Justin=