flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: CONFIG::performanceInstrumentation / PerfUtil?
Date Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:34:52 GMT

On 12/11/12 12:56 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoublefx@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> I don't know what kinds of changes folks have planned for the current Flex
> SDK code, but other than the CSS perf fix, I haven't seen too many other
> things that would make getting this stuff through an audit a priority.
> It's not a priority but that gonna become usefull especialy when we gonna
> try to optimize UIComponent and other pieces of the SDK
If we see activity in that area, then we can decide on whether it will be
less time to create our own perf suite within the constraints of Apache or
go through the hassle of getting these tests donated and separated from
their server dependencies.
>> The problem with any perf suite that runs on people's computers is the
> possibility of variances between runs that are unrelated to the code
> changes.
> You right, do you think ASF can provide this kind of computer ? we don't
> even need a powerfull one but just one to serve as baseline.
AFAIK, ASF does not supply separate servers.  Everything is shared.  I'm
seriously considering buying my own computers to run CI.
>>  I think we had a dedicated sandboxed computer for official testing
> at Adobe.
> You haven't see it ?
We burned out at least two engineers trying to create an automated perf
suite.  I was not involved.  But from the email trail, it was not a smooth

Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.

View raw message