Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 77128E567 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 21:18:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8340 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2012 21:18:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 8306 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2012 21:18:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 8297 invoked by uid 99); 21 Nov 2012 21:18:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 21:18:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of omarg.developer@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.175] (HELO mail-ia0-f175.google.com) (209.85.210.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 21:18:42 +0000 Received: by mail-ia0-f175.google.com with SMTP id z3so5183655iad.6 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:18:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=wOYwzvjE7MlyF+u+noyAg4yVd1ZXh5+wuH28/MPwUZM=; b=ItRTKhViuo02kdyHFNau52Ckhx2TeMUf9brpvwvU00QEBcSeZAF5XSBok57Kz1zBys qc33BIbjXUHPlv51M+mCNBwO4jMKeLjVMo5SKv0KbDAFMTAWEZKwvguSvAVwoqbkJ6xC jAVAqg8jExJ3q+HaWx+MGPqz+5goRtZVs4l/LFldX7rGnfYtKJ3UrEL5PzyZM0+EWzFc 5nW/0uOoS5GaedkMUGfKwUT1206vDkL6fVjZtEZiUWHY24IjVPGy7F5GaHBNYuwW9SsF qB7WUbDIpgXwt9rhlHXiFMRkyGXh1H97FbCtY63BLxnsL6mr/i9m2IFAlmwDEtY9DAG6 sROA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.11.167 with SMTP id r7mr998946igb.18.1353532702025; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:18:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.83.11 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:18:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1C09B1BA-43C6-4335-9005-A7A1AED04800@classsoftware.com> References: <4912D238-05FD-453D-8100-DD17C86F3FF0@classsoftware.com> <1C09B1BA-43C6-4335-9005-A7A1AED04800@classsoftware.com> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:18:21 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Make Git happen From: Omar Gonzalez To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f64671fe565ad04cf07e36a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8f64671fe565ad04cf07e36a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Would Is it easier to make progress if we remove github from the equation > for now and revisit? (And just keep the githib mirror as we do now) The > vote if I recall was to use git not github. > > Thanks, > Justin The mirrors to GitHub were really just an interim solution while we got a read/write Apache hosted Git repository. I would be perfectly happy with killing the GitHub mirrors if it meant we got a read/write Apache hosted Git repository. It would facilitate managing the Git patches as it would remove the step of having to deal with Pull Requests submitted via GitHub. I think its more important to have the read/write Git than it is to also have a GitHub mirror and support Pull Requests from GitHub. Even thought Pull Requests and Forking on GitHub would greatly improve workflows, specifically handling code reviews for code patches. We can do that in JIRA, but it wouldn't be as efficient as GitHub due to the lack of being able to comment on specific lines of code right in the repository browser viewer. Not to mention the ease with which you can integrate Pull Requests via the GitHub GUI. -omar --e89a8f64671fe565ad04cf07e36a--