Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02920DD75 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 10:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42514 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2012 10:50:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 41685 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2012 10:50:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 41654 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2012 10:50:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 10:50:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of webdoublefx@hotmail.com designates 65.55.111.110 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.55.111.110] (HELO blu0-omc2-s35.blu0.hotmail.com) (65.55.111.110) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 10:50:37 +0000 Received: from BLU162-DS5 ([65.55.111.72]) by blu0-omc2-s35.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 22 Nov 2012 02:50:15 -0800 X-Originating-IP: [82.247.153.175] X-EIP: [NCoiz2XKo5/jZGoekcN0AjBw7nvJDNP/] X-Originating-Email: [webdoublefx@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_THOMAS?= To: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Rushing into Git Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:50:16 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3505.912 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3505.912 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Nov 2012 10:50:15.0916 (UTC) FILETIME=[27F252C0:01CDC89F] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, The only problem at the moment seems that the svn/git mirroring is slow. I don't know if it's applicable for asf or even if they already considered it but in the last company I've been working for, they used subgit [1] to mirror the svn repositories and after a one-time setup which cloned our svn repo, the mirroring was almost instaneous (both sides), the benefit is keeping svn as main repository while having the ability to work with git transparently. [1] http://subgit.com/ - Fred. -----Message d'origine----- From: Carlos Rovira Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 11:32 AM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Rushing into Git Hi Bertrand, 2012/11/22 Bertrand Delacretaz > > FWIW, my reservations were based on > > a) Git support from ASF infra is still experimental and needs > knowledgeable volunteeers (I'd even say Git experts) in the PMC to > work. > I count 46 projects on GIT (see https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf) so it's hard for me continue to think it's "experimental" today. > > b) One of the arguments that we keep hearing is that Git will > magically cause tons of code contributions to land here. Besides > drive-by contributions (small, obvious things) which are easier with > github, I'm not convinced of that. > As you say, maybe this will end not happen, but it could be the opposite, and walk backwards like crabs: Staying in GIT could bring less contributions than expected or make potential contributors not encourage to expend the time since they are not confortable with the overall process. -- Carlos Rovira Director de Tecnolog�a M: +34 607 22 60 05 F: +34 912 35 57 77 http://www.codeoscopic.com http://www.directwriter.es http://www.avant2.es