Return-Path: 
 <flex-dev-return-14063-apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18F899336
	for <apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Tue,  6 Nov 2012 01:51:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 8181 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2012 01:50:59 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 8146 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2012 01:50:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:flex-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <flex-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 8138 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2012 01:50:59 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 01:50:59 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of webdoublefx@hotmail.com
 designates 65.55.111.85 as permitted sender)
Received: from [65.55.111.85] (HELO blu0-omc2-s10.blu0.hotmail.com)
 (65.55.111.85)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 01:50:49 +0000
Received: from BLU162-DS17 ([65.55.111.72]) by blu0-omc2-s10.blu0.hotmail.com
 with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675);
	 Mon, 5 Nov 2012 17:50:27 -0800
X-Originating-IP: [82.247.153.175]
X-EIP: [2LGrbZiy3i18AtG1lhoseK3PuzmNunDW]
X-Originating-Email: [webdoublefx@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU162-ds17C7E4126008C9D21D4A5FB46B0@phx.gbl>
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_THOMAS?= <webdoublefx@hotmail.com>
To: <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
References: <CCBD3788.480BC%aharui@adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: <CCBD3788.480BC%aharui@adobe.com>
Subject: Re: About Flex runtime
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 02:50:23 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3505.912
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3505.912
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Nov 2012 01:50:27.0195 (UTC)
 FILETIME=[1827B4B0:01CDBBC1]
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Actually, I implemented the last one tonight, it took me a bit of time in 
notepad ^^ but it does the job, I still have to modify the tests themself 
and that, should take me until the end of the week end, I'll be busy this 
week.

Now those are valids :
<AssertError value="Error: Le param�tre allowedFormatChars est incorrect. Il 
ne doit pas contenir de chiffres." />
<AssertError value="{['ReferenceError: Error #1074:', 'country', 
'mx.resources.Locale']}"/>
<AssertError value="{['ReferenceError: Error #1074:']}"/>
<AssertError value="{[]}"/> // pass each time which make sens because it 
means contains nulls
<AssertError value=""/> // unchanged

The error message for "contains" looks like: Expected Error contains 
"ReferenceError: Error #1074:"..."country"..."mx.resources.Locale", got .... 
(the real error)

Any thoughts ?

-----Message d'origine----- 
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 6:29 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: About Flex runtime




On 11/4/12 11:35 PM, "Fr�d�ric THOMAS" <webdoublefx@hotmail.com> wrote:

> I'm for the last proposal and I was thinking about to create an other
> assertion like AssertErrorContains which would take an Array as parameter 
> to
> check the error value against.
>
> Something like <AssertErrorContains value="{['ReferenceError: Error 
> #1074:',
> 'variant', 'mx.resources.Locale.']}"/>
>
I think I would just add a "contains" property to AssertError, we'll
probably have to go touch each one of them anyway.  I would lean against
adding a new test step.

Or maybe just change AssertError to do an indexOf instead of == and override
"value" so if it gets an array it do indexOf on the array.  Hmm.  I like
this one better.

> What do you think ?
>

-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui