flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: [FalconJS] concepts
Date Wed, 28 Nov 2012 21:42:46 GMT

On 11/28/12 1:35 PM, "Daniel Wasilewski" <devudesign@gmail.com> wrote:

> So, please tell me why not to go the classic route as a very little overhaul
> for the application that can be built on top of AS3/Flex?
> This is bloody 3 classes with 4 methods in it, and we are not talking here
> about few % but tens.
> It can only grow exponentially to the scale of your project.
I don't know enough to have an reason not to go the classic route.  But
someone else will have to step up to do the work.

That said, because we are cross compiling AS, does the classic route support
as many features of AS, especially the reflection-oriented features?  We
want to try to compile business logic untouched and it might be using "is",
"in", "instanceof", etc.  Resig's blog seems to indicate that support for
instanceOf was important and required all of that code.

> Dan

Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.

View raw message