Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 89C6B99AC for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 14:17:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9606 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2012 14:17:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 9580 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2012 14:17:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 9572 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2012 14:17:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 14:17:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of omarg.developer@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.175] (HELO mail-vc0-f175.google.com) (209.85.220.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 14:17:04 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id p1so581000vcq.6 for ; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 07:16:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=olE2FzoBVFSY2fYsmVNl47R3SGrVzyU8Zpq7kISl/xE=; b=s2VIOTHZq3riiv/dA97OFBPQjZbuuTRrdujQc9D9GbYTpBduM1EQxmrjJvTLaP6UCL Yg+QE70MP0nY/b+URXsHVFlVnVVV9Gk7WT8UNNZIHL+1q1T3RMPEmjJMOSxtgLpyOYw4 rcEGpMTqZaeT0+pzbw60iUTwGPtH5mJgjy48HhuKv5ItDkd9IdAPPewRFVsf7HwQ+0FP GskLim/ZxR9YbyCZwGUaBnE+cAn/QcR6IWJQLkrkS206lZxpVRl8J+0raIa6HUuSY6vX IAzeib7vXzy1ofSfJO3TtFUaAUKqeRb0fCVSGf2Iyg+s/tPcvMmSt2lt/eqxsoyzqhFu ox/Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.66.233 with SMTP id i9mr70339vdt.78.1349360203826; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 07:16:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.208.167 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 07:16:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <25B06CEF-9C52-41BA-8BE3-4B8EDAB05672@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 07:16:43 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] "The more designer tools exist for HTML5, the more attractive HTML5 becomes" From: Omar Gonzalez To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307d026a9f840404cb3c673f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf307d026a9f840404cb3c673f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Why is there a vote on something that has nothing to do with Flex SDK development? This is not the place for this opinion poll, it is not a vote. And I'm not voting because its off topic. Omar Gonzalez s9tpepper@apache.org Apache Flex PPMC On Thursday, October 4, 2012, Michael Sumner wrote: > +1 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sebastian Mohr [mailto:masuland@gmail.com ] > Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 3:57 AM > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] "The more designer tools exist for HTML5, the more > attractive HTML5 becomes" > > Fortunately, there are finally interaction design tools around that are > officially supporting HTML5 [1]. > > Please vote to approve the assumption (in the subject): > > [ ] +1 I approve it > [ ] -1 I veto it > > > Sincerely Yours, > > Sebastian Mohr > Apache Flex Developer (PPMC), > Interaction Designer & Musician > http://www.linkedin.com/in/masuland > > [1] http://html.adobe.com/ > > > --20cf307d026a9f840404cb3c673f--