Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 01D6ED8C9 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 03:43:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11011 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2012 03:43:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 10984 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2012 03:43:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 10930 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2012 03:43:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 03:43:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of webdoublefx@hotmail.com designates 65.55.111.98 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.55.111.98] (HELO blu0-omc2-s23.blu0.hotmail.com) (65.55.111.98) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 03:43:00 +0000 Received: from BLU162-DS17 ([65.55.111.73]) by blu0-omc2-s23.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 28 Oct 2012 20:42:39 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [82.247.153.175] X-EIP: [fEnnpPqodUKh0nkNUMmn2Oovm/V+NTxo] X-Originating-Email: [webdoublefx@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_THOMAS?= To: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: About Flex runtime Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 04:42:38 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3505.912 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3505.912 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Oct 2012 03:42:39.0483 (UTC) FILETIME=[719B54B0:01CDB587] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Just update from svn, rebuilt, ran mustella tests and got 104 fails, 55 related to MarshallPlan (FP11.1) > I still think that if you use -createImages you could create baselines > that miss something when you make changes, if your configuration has some error. If I run -createImages just after I check out set playerglobal / swf-version in the build.properties and build the framework, where is the risk ? -----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 4:30 AM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: About Flex runtime On 10/28/12 1:27 AM, "Fr�d�ric THOMAS" wrote: > Anyway, I don't want to change the actual things, my goal basicly was to > be > able to build and test the current framework against a particular > playerglobal version and make sure the tests would pass if I modify the > framework, I discovered 2 things, the first one was a mustella java bug, > the > second is that in order to have a valid buid that can pass the tests, I > need > to specify in more than the playerglobal version, the swf-version which > not > appear today in the build.properties but can be used anyway, I'm just > saying > that if it would appear, it would make the live of the folks easier > because > they would be aware of its importance. > Thanks for finding these issues. I still think that if you use -createImages you could create baselines that miss something when you make changes, if your configuration has some error. -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui