flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
Subject Re: About Flex runtime
Date Sun, 28 Oct 2012 08:27:23 GMT
Anyway, I don't want to change the actual things, my goal basicly was to be 
able to build and test the current framework against a particular 
playerglobal version and make sure the tests would pass if I modify the 
framework, I discovered 2 things, the first one was a mustella java bug, the 
second is that in order to have a valid buid that can pass the tests, I need 
to specify in more than the playerglobal version, the swf-version which not 
appear today in the build.properties but can be used anyway, I'm just saying 
that if it would appear, it would make the live of the folks easier because 
they would be aware of its importance.

-----Message d'origine----- 
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 9:13 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: About Flex runtime

It could be done but it's not necessary IMO, each other can modify and run
the tests for a particular playerglobal/swf-version, as soon as they want to
check in, they just have to make sure those changes pass in the current
official version of the framework.

-----Message d'origine----- 
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 8:59 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: About Flex runtime


Just a suggestion why not add the flash player version to the image path if
they differ by a signifiant amount? That way we have multiple baselines, and
any new changes would show up if they break one or more versions of the
flash player.


View raw message