Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE76BDFF8 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:06:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8294 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2012 15:06:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 8260 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2012 15:06:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 8250 invoked by uid 99); 19 Sep 2012 15:06:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:06:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of scastle@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.208 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.208] (HELO exprod6og107.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.208) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:06:17 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob107.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUFnfVemh8gXGDsOu1YSuNgjtmqLkKJ1U@postini.com; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:05:57 PDT Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4.adobe.com [193.104.215.14]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q8JF3J5I029530 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:03:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nacas03.corp.adobe.com (nacas03.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.121]) by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id q8JF51Xm029831 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:05:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nambx09.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.47]) by nacas03.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.121]) with mapi; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:05:47 -0700 From: Scott Castle To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:05:47 -0700 Subject: Re: Flash Builder 4.7 Beta with Apache Flex 4.8 support Thread-Topic: Flash Builder 4.7 Beta with Apache Flex 4.8 support Thread-Index: Ac2WeD+g72eB/Ig8Rzie58uA2kAAYg== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.12.0.110505 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org FB 4.7 no longer includes design view. On 9/19/12 6:31 AM, "Charles Monteiro" wrote: >sorry, It's not clear whether this new announced release supports the ui >designer. > >Thanks >On Sep 18, 2012 8:27 PM, "Scott Castle" wrote: > >> >> How is Flash Builder 4.7 supporting Apache Flex 4.8? >> We've made a number of changes to how Flash Builder deals with SDK >> identification and versioning to permit it to work with new Apache SDKs, >> both the current 4.8 drop as well as future versions (there's a lot of >> quirky behavior we've seen dropping new SDKs into 4.6). We've also done >> extensive testing, which isn't directly visible as a new feature but >> should ensure a much smoother user experience. >> >> - Scott >> >> >> >> On 9/18/12 4:11 PM, "Jeffry Houser" wrote: >> >> >On 9/18/2012 4:26 PM, Scott Castle wrote: >> >> Hi Flex developers, >> >> >> >> I wanted to let the list know that the latest version of Flash >>Builder >> >>is >> >> currently in public beta with support for Apache Flex 4.8. >> > What does this mean? I couldn't figure out how Flash Builder 4.7 >> >support for Apache Flex is any different than Flash Builder 4.6 support >> >for Apache Flex. >> > How is Flash Builder 4.7 supporting Apache Flex 4.8? >> > >> > I understand we can set up the Apache Flex SDK; but saw nothing else. >> >There is no documentation [that I could find] about what that support >> >actually means, or how it translates into a Flash Builder feature that >> >was not there before. >> > >> > [Thank you for 64-bit Flash Builder, though] >> > >> >>