Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 704F4D962 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 22:30:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28272 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2012 22:30:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 28243 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2012 22:30:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 28235 invoked by uid 99); 2 Sep 2012 22:30:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 22:30:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.47] (HELO mail-bk0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 22:30:10 +0000 Received: by bkcik5 with SMTP id ik5so2277095bkc.6 for ; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 15:29:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=OuZvE0/crD2vUxvqluc3/TgnMiDOMVrYBBsL9DA9n00=; b=VjEw5DoR7ajHpvCeB8dyyZy0vndPfxOlTaB6/yBvp03BeeBYk6MmNVIiR+CkjKTt8U VSfgh83thZQO70Uc/+mXLOXjfCL6ZQO8hBPD7u0bOdQnooQu/sMhFWONVbPq276O6xsF niI20gLhc0Fj7c3IT6JfW5DjbatXcJElXI7y0E0In5oK5emymZ1L4NkJ5Annlsn3iPEA 1hA6l+oRWUaGt0QHIoxDIXYw/wTGX6S+xEK/SORM5Fl2hZaF9ww4/3cBVgREKpSQCq7k us/NlMZpNPAQyRTcNGKnGud1uX98sEUjGY+um1tNaIHHUJgDsY0jtoe3xXYVhTcHPM9Y v7Mg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.128.213 with SMTP id l21mr6124168bks.84.1346624988028; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 15:29:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.128.198 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 15:29:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [173.10.39.57] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 18:29:47 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: May I fork the project for creating a reduced version of it? From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015173ff30e0e9ebd04c8bf9015 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmDRIo6Yv49otaF3GJXz2TNq/C1ljuZSaGBOGA9TxfFE+eTD2WhKLsJVY8WimnSj13YYwyv --0015173ff30e0e9ebd04c8bf9015 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Oleg, Anybody is free to create an installable version of the SDK. Chances are, we will probably link to it from the mail site as well (after a committer double checks it to make sure it didn't break in the process). If you would be willing to make a .DEB / .RPM / etc. packages, that would be awesome. -Nick On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Left Right wrote: > > Why should it need a DEB package > Because this is the common way to install programs on Debian-like > systems. SDK has tons of dependencies, resolving them all by hand is > difficult and time consuming. > It could be RPM too, or whatever there's the way to install on other > platforms. The more the merrier. > > For example, the build readme now says that it needs Java 1.6 (but you > will have Java 1.7 most of the time). I don't think anyone tested the > SDK with OpenJDK or IBM JDK - OpenJDK is what gets installed on Linux > by default. > > It also makes it easier to support it, because if you know how the > program was possibly installed, you'd know where to find it on other > people systems and fix, if anything is broken. > > Best. > > Oleg > --0015173ff30e0e9ebd04c8bf9015--