Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B0F2D2D2 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:24:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75300 invoked by uid 500); 25 Sep 2012 20:24:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 75272 invoked by uid 500); 25 Sep 2012 20:24:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 75261 invoked by uid 99); 25 Sep 2012 20:24:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:24:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jonbcampos@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.47] (HELO mail-oa0-f47.google.com) (209.85.219.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:24:34 +0000 Received: by oagn9 with SMTP id n9so7244366oag.6 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:24:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=2zmJvZKyJv8R/1jdHe/AbN4zGodN5w/DaK3RXT8/2d0=; b=rm1ZPlmlM2mkhxjuc7t41fmUoefoCVw9QeKiJXnadU+6+jIuwU727vjThuiRnAbyqs 5D+63Gll0mJwCWJLZmIoSAfOTf3CDQqVBKL0rAgK7Qi6jInNfrjcUq83S2CRmkHlZHJc H2nnEgDDIbpgL7mymc/y2EOHdzaS3p/NMhGS/3Qqz1jgkXdgeHdkJ40pUqMovqZkCTDq myKoLY9eRQ2uLJO4/THkGFpxqxVCHNwfiqnI6SDcy5Bx1uysLejwLJrKbexonTqtTlN1 Xvxb4uRhwfJ9xCNVaBQSfQxHWUHGT7QcTlv1pNbR1mVFDmpyFmxekPNNL9P2bhsmd7Pv yggg== Received: by 10.182.207.6 with SMTP id ls6mr13532444obc.36.1348604653922; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:24:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.101.169 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:23:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jonathan Campos Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:23:53 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposal for contributing code from GraniteDS To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f646e2b56ea2c04ca8c7def --e89a8f646e2b56ea2c04ca8c7def Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Om wrote: > Can we make sure that this approach does not tie Flex to specific > server side solution (Java in this case)? > This is my exact concern. Great list Om. There is already such a huge group of companies that think if they don't use LCDS or Java/BlazeDS that Flex isn't for them. -- Jonathan Campos --e89a8f646e2b56ea2c04ca8c7def--