Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65911D282 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:51:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22314 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2012 19:51:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22266 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2012 19:51:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22256 invoked by uid 99); 10 Aug 2012 19:51:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:51:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cframpto@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.181 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.181] (HELO exprod6og101.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:51:31 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by exprod6ob101.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUCVmLT6w6LJU5JtcM1YSDx0pxGGQ8xJQ@postini.com; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:51:10 PDT Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4b [10.128.4.237]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q7AJp88N003594 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:51:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nahub02.corp.adobe.com (nahub02.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.98]) by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id q7AJp7Yr000310 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:51:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SJ1SWM219.corp.adobe.com (10.5.77.61) by nahub02.corp.adobe.com (10.8.189.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.264.0; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:51:07 -0700 Received: from nambx09.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.47]) by SJ1SWM219.corp.adobe.com ([fe80::d55c:7209:7a34:fcf7%11]) with mapi; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:51:07 -0700 From: Carol Frampton To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:51:03 -0700 Subject: Re: What would it take to move to Git? Thread-Topic: What would it take to move to Git? Thread-Index: Ac13MXrv+Ps5qRAuRwKImCKVB77a0g== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 On 8/10/12 2 :55PM, "Omar Gonzalez" wrote: >> >> I'm guessing we are one of the larger >> projects at Apache in terms of code size > > >This is precisely why I think we should strongly consider moving to Git. > >I understand the apprehension some may have with learn "Yet Another SCM >Control", but really? How many other SCM systems have you used besides SVN >and maybe CVS? I'm sure its not all that many. I can think of at least 4 that I've used extensively but I think it might be 5. I'm sure I can figure a new one out. I'm just tired of spending time arguing about this kind of stuff. In the meantime very few people have made any contributions so maybe we are way over-engineering what is actually needed. And unlike Gordon, I don't want my access to source control to be thru FlashBuilder. Carol