Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of
 joaopedromartinsfernandes@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.175 as permitted
 sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CC4FF44B.44846%aharui@adobe.com>
References: 
 <CAGgUee0O5sGH2xeibMXcjOU_nDPpeHQuZvbKNbPRNONvAKqrhw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CC4FF44B.44846%aharui@adobe.com>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Fernandes?= <joaopedromartinsfernandes@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:36:27 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAGgUee16xuPLVkoZ87k1KDM1sMvt7143pcVSA+kN4PmLaWxUsg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Discuss: Branching Strategy and SCM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b621e925f1c9e04c73eeed5

--047d7b621e925f1c9e04c73eeed5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Alex but probably there won't be 1 branch / dev, multiple devs will
probably focus on the same branch.

Also, I think it's better to veto before committing to develop no?
I would like to replace [DISCUSSION] by [PROPOSAL], so if anyone developed
/ fixed stuff in their branch, they would launch a [PROPOSAL] thread so
people could chime in regarding the implementation. Afterwards, a [VOTE]
would be created so the implementation could be merged into the Develop
branch.

Is this unrealistic ?

Jo=E3o Fernandes

--047d7b621e925f1c9e04c73eeed5--