Return-Path: 
 <flex-dev-return-11002-apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA447DDA5
	for <apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Tue, 14 Aug 2012 03:26:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 57328 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2012 03:26:18 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 57161 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2012 03:26:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:flex-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <flex-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 57113 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2012 03:26:16 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 03:26:16 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of omuppi1@gmail.com designates
 209.85.217.175 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.217.175] (HELO mail-lb0-f175.google.com)
 (209.85.217.175)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 03:26:11 +0000
Received: by lban1 with SMTP id n1so3943lba.6
        for <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>;
 Mon, 13 Aug 2012 20:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id
         :subject:to:content-type;
        bh=lEJKvQeFbkke0Kc9paIS3xrBTbxkuyLQNjmr2HpmhQ0=;
        b=tv8P3BYQUN7RKTSIir4xy1mf5osAwOnswbaeQD9DNPZz9SRMl7cGYvqux2qjzgKHli
         jxKrHoGq9ML9gX6pz8m844gBagrMzz29Uk4nqiGIAi5Y232HOCaEYwktc5nLTlipcIyT
         56/rfmKLfNAbh/gmdEeWHsv48cDqEmBPcYbGXm6GMYMokFJWjzEnSuyd2Oz681KTMVVA
         0McEOIhlK+2sYfj3mFIOxIcQ3ztgLDVUZ+874m2qMYoCAq8ZOnk9/ifbbSA/HBq/PUX7
         0i164/6jkxPJa0ffNoqTjz3TIW5msXqt6e1WFXoKa+x9LkuloQQ5nKwuUg2If5L5eYgZ
         gHBQ==
Received: by 10.152.125.116 with SMTP id mp20mr10667600lab.19.1344914750178;
 Mon, 13 Aug 2012 20:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: omuppi1@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.81.74 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 20:25:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Om <bigosmallm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 20:25:19 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: BpapRbCGxnffApx9F5QpLkqEu9k
Message-ID: 
 <CACK5iZfOaV3Sjn_He7EQXsTGC376f=ioO0dUWqXOZBUgcTZogQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Discuss: Branching Strategy and SCM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0435be6ef006f404c7315d19
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--f46d0435be6ef006f404c7315d19
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> - Unsure how it is decided what from develop/trunk goes into a release.
> IMO this will make releases a lot more work for the release manager and
> less likely someone will want to take on that role.
>

Doesn't option 4 exacerbate this problem?  How can this be a reason to vote
'for' option 4?

--f46d0435be6ef006f404c7315d19--