Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B11D9E9A for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 08:39:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99699 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2012 08:39:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 99638 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2012 08:39:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 99624 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2012 08:39:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 08:39:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of omuppi1@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.175] (HELO mail-lb0-f175.google.com) (209.85.217.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 08:39:46 +0000 Received: by lban1 with SMTP id n1so1263481lba.6 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 01:39:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=E/53/um/BgEJ+YjoLKSCOEJRbQ1duPAn58otrO/zV6k=; b=1HiyrmspOFiFPmy/493Pe9taSmXYZkVrl9CiX5m0Xs/Q3v9QdtFrmDqLtwcaiHW/bM WP8XeYP5AJpVP3BedsSDv8vk9DKVURqK6U/V68RDjoxuoEHSij/hBUrppVaaGCdj5gMd azltdsle/BL2jkJIvn/7Ba3u/LmCWoE0gYC2EW/JU0aIAdDONimZ3vrRBXmZhWG0v88c N+wY6BVtGOSdRxG4L8xOWdra95vWrF4ItbHcL3yOcHFfF8A3wFWqLp8HtaF7yb0Z3Zly bcAzjOGRcNytKR6yoGRLZ5puEJwyXB2931eVBiyBdoRvUGxLFPQ7mGdJh8M4bO/cHi0q WuSg== Received: by 10.152.102.234 with SMTP id fr10mr447481lab.32.1345106364906; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 01:39:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: omuppi1@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.81.74 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 01:38:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <935465F2-1651-4E63-8495-44CEA31CE896@comcast.net> From: Om Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 01:38:54 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: mZCdmS97qq1X6pF8XrwiwEVpju8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: InstallApacheFlex - Where to host it? To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0407125910bc1804c75dfb44 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d0407125910bc1804c75dfb44 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Roland Zwaga wrote: > > I'm sorry, my daily dose of caffeine clearly hasn't kicked in yet. How > > would this work? If the swc is not part of the Flash builder project, > > how would we be able to use it? How is this better than including the > > actual source files, like we do for the crypto components? > > Maybe I misunderstood Bertrand's message wrong. If it is allowed to > directly check out the code and make a build from that, then by all means, > go for that ;) > > Roland > Now I am confused. To be clear, we would have to copy the code from as3commons and put it in the flex svn repo. And we release the as3commons source as part of the installapacheflex source release (of course with all the attributions) Are you saying something difference? Om --f46d0407125910bc1804c75dfb44--