Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2DA9BDA7B for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41153 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2012 20:00:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 41118 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2012 20:00:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 41084 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2012 20:00:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:00:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of omuppi1@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.47] (HELO mail-lpp01m010-f47.google.com) (209.85.215.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:59:57 +0000 Received: by lagv3 with SMTP id v3so401724lag.6 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:59:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=n9S0UlDNU6jVbRCZJBkM7/PrndtV7Hsgupp6xRXnXJM=; b=FC+5xRgejPr/CLNbz0hNz+c5vLBHoX5+/RHdYOfhFYK3JnM8B2MGYAIp8R2ps7vEO/ TKVH9aMSS6g5chIwxwLGSpxT9WBsq2Uaq5hKPeGjHgIOemjwEMj3lIBAx8CiGj5V9p0H zGqTVztbKB1YB/tCkZAwIz1mkSVdYNNEp5MsWLH9Kk7Vj9jzVNkj2//jztpvliNi+RYb 9fCXzr4bYjQWCIoktrqghmr4gWJeeNoxzXZRpIUTliDUkOShkiUphTV4vEgwOAOBlIvB inTh9Hgk0/ROE3cvYYJvThVti1swqZ6dg18LDkwhkm0n6q7K9Y/mSI5cApa9K+5SEGeq hXfA== Received: by 10.112.17.161 with SMTP id p1mr8502122lbd.64.1344974376696; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:59:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: omuppi1@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.81.74 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:59:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <149F8129B58B2D418508E63117D9C5419B3A5458B0@nambx05.corp.adobe.com> References: <149F8129B58B2D418508E63117D9C5419B3A5458B0@nambx05.corp.adobe.com> From: Om Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:59:05 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ulGP54V0v2aPS7vpelrcTXAHBxY Message-ID: Subject: Re: Falcon location To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec554d322f47a6104c73f3f41 --bcaec554d322f47a6104c73f3f41 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Gordon, Sorry for jumping late into this thread, but I am not sure what exactly Falcon is at this point. I was hoping that you would post some wiki pages about what exactly Falcon is. There is very little public information about Falcon (that I could google) >From what I understand (please correct me if I am wrong), Falcon is a new version of the Actionscript compiler. Does it support mxml as well? Or would that be a separate top level project? What do we call the compiler that is currently inside trunk? If falcon gets a new top level project, shouldnt the current compiler get its own top level project? Does Falcon work with exisiting flex sdk? If I create new components inside incubator/flex/SDK/trunk/, should I worry about who Falcon will work with it? How would I set up my project in that case? Should I have copies of my new components in both incubator/flex/SDK/trunk/ and incubator/flex/Falcon/trunk/ to run both Mustella tests and Falcon's tests? (Thinking ahead) Does Falcon share any code with Falcon JS? If yes, how might we want to change the repo structure if/when FalconJS is contributed to Apache Flex? Sorry, if some of these questions sound stupid. But we will be able to make a better judgement of where it should go if we knew some more details. Thanks, Om On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Gordon Smith wrote: > It seems like the momentum is for > > incubator/flex > incubator/flex/SDK > incubator/flex/SDK/trunk > incubator/flex/SDK/branches > incubator/flex/SDK/tags > incubator/flex/SDK/whiteboard > incubator/flex/Falcon > incubator/flex/Falcon/trunk > incubator/flex/Falcon/branches > incubator/flex/Falcon/tags > incubator/flex/Falcon/whiteboard > incubator/flex/TLF > incubator/flex/TLF/trunk > incubator/flex/TLF/branches > incubator/flex/TLF/tags > incubator/flex/TLF/whiteboard > > Should the SDK directory be called Framework instead? To me, the SDK is > something that would be produced at the incubator/flex level from all the > subprojects. > > - Gordon > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Campos [mailto:jonbcampos@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 11:43 AM > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Falcon location > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Carol Frampton > wrote: > > > +1 except remove projects directory and put each project at top-level and > > add tags subdirectory under each project > > > > Agreed with Carol. > > -- > Jonathan Campos > --bcaec554d322f47a6104c73f3f41--