flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Conrad <jeff...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Should .project, .flexLibProperties, and .actionScriptProperties be checked in to source control? (Was: svn commit: r1375263 [1/2] - in /incubator/flex/sdk/branches/develop/frameworks/projects)
Date Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:14:22 GMT
Hi Carol,

I think Justin's question was more oriented around what's the best
practice for checking in .project, .flexLibProperties, and
.actionScriptProperties files?  Should they be included in source
control or ignored?

I took a peek at some of the files included and they contain some
important information that would make any potential contributor's job
easy.  For instance, in projects/framework/.actionScriptProperties,
there are a ton of additional compiler arguments that if I had to put
into every project like that, I'd go crazy:

-resource-bundle-list=bundles.properties -library-path= -locale="

I'm in favor of either keeping this information in source control.  I
don't want to have to remember all of that to make sure I'm building
the SDK correctly.

I suppose the other question that has to be asked, though, is whether
or not Flash Builder would be making different SWCs than the ant
scripts or where all of that information is included.  It looks like
the ant scripts set the same arguments directly in the build.xml file.

When someone gets time, maybe we can move all those arguments to
framework-config.xml file and have both the .actionScriptProperties
and build.xml file reference those so it's more DRY?  I'll do it
sometime this week, but someone is more than welcome to beat me to it.

Does anyone know if there's a quirk in the compiler that causes
information set in a flex-config.xml file to be ignored by either the
Ant or Flash Builder?  If it's a bug in the compiler, I'll just leave
well enough alone until after Falcon.


On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Carol Frampton <cframpto@adobe.com> wrote:
> It loos like lots of newlines got introduced but no code changes other
> than the headers.  I hink I'll rollback the commit and do it again.
> Thanks for pointing that out.  I usually diff my changes before committing
> them but I obviously didn't this time.
> Carol
> On 8/20/12 6 :12PM, "Justin Mclean" <justin@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Noticed the ".project", ".actionScriptProperties" and
> >".flexLibProperties" mark marked as modified. Are they spposed to be
> >checked in?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Justin

View raw message