flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>
Subject Re: [MENTORS] Current Branching Strategy Vote Results
Date Wed, 15 Aug 2012 09:01:32 GMT

the problem is not about tooling. Is about the things we plan to do. The
revision and transformation of the core at flex. If there's a development
model based on SVN chaos, nobody will spend an hour to make it happen.

This my unweight opinion as a community member.

2012/8/15 Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@apache.org>

> Hi,
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
> > ...We’re just past the halfway mark (and some folks who voted in the
> poll have not yet voted)
> > but if I culled the votes properly (see below), there is a significant
> difference of opinion
> > between the PPMC and the community...
> This is about which tools the committers use (and might have to
> partially support in case of Git, for now) so I wouldn't give much
> weight to the community's opinion in this particular case. Those who
> do the work decide IMO.
> From the community point of view, one big advantage of github IMO is
> that it makes "drive-by contributions" easier, as you don't need to
> subscribe to anything to create a pull request - but it's totally
> possible for Flex committers to commit the occasional pull requests
> that come in against the existing mirrors listed at
> http://git.apache.org/ - and if/when those become too frequent, that
> would be the time to revisit the tooling.
> -Bertrand

Carlos Rovira
Director de Tecnología
M: +34 607 22 60 05
F:  +34 912 35 57 77
CODEOSCOPIC S.A. <http://www.codeoscopic.com>
Avd. del General Perón, 32
Planta 10, Puertas P-Q
28020 Madrid

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message