flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>
Subject Re: What would it take to move to Git?
Date Mon, 13 Aug 2012 16:42:31 GMT
IMHO, and taking into account that I'm only a not-binding vote...

I don't see real arguments against Git and maybe as Omar says people does
not want to figth with yet another SCM...

But the real problem for me is that we can't target the changes we plan
without a tool like Git. Maybe people that does not know Git does not
understand this, but we were not able to make such deep changes if we are
using SVN.

That's the real problem, and that's what we end planing the use of
Git...this is not a techy discussion. We at work had to change two months
ago due to hard refactors in our main product, and we changed because SVN
was not letting us do such deep changes.

So my vote will go for Git without doubt...if we don't use it, we should
not be able to change things like UIComponent...hope people that does not
want Git understand this.

2012/8/13 Omar Gonzalez <omarg.developer@gmail.com>

> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Carol Frampton <cframpto@adobe.com>
> wrote:
> > A clarification question about Git:
> >
> > Would I lose the ability to look at the repro thru the web. I make use of
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/trunk/ etc more often
> then
> > I expected.
> >
> > Carol
> > >
> >
> >
> You can browse it through Git HTTP: http://git.apache.org/flex-site.git/
> Or you can view it through GitHub: https://github.com/apache/flex
> -omar

Carlos Rovira
Director de Tecnología
M: +34 607 22 60 05
F:  +34 912 35 57 77
CODEOSCOPIC S.A. <http://www.codeoscopic.com>
Avd. del General Perón, 32
Planta 10, Puertas P-Q
28020 Madrid

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message