flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gordon Smith <gosm...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: Mixed Case class names and SW, SWC etc
Date Sat, 18 Aug 2012 00:53:45 GMT
On second thought, changing them would be a bad idea because this convention comes from the
flash.* API. In other words, it wasn't an arbitrary choice for Flex. As long as Flex is Flash-based,
acronyms should not be mixed case, so that the API looks consistent at all levels of the platform

- Gordon

-----Original Message-----
From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosmith@adobe.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 5:42 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: espenskogen@apache.org 

I wouldn't object if you want to change all of them, in all classes, interfaces, functions,
etc. I would object to not being consistent.

- Gordon

-----Original Message-----
From: Tink [mailto:flex@tink.ws] 
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 3:14 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: espenskogen@apache.org 

I've followed these coding standard for some time, it makes sense to keep all code to a particular
standard, but I think is is one is a mistake.

I've so often ended up will classes like FXQSIForm, which would be so much better as FxQsiForm.


On 17 Aug 2012, at 20:08, Gordon Smith wrote:

>> SwfClassLoader.as
> Hi, I wanted to mention that the Flex coding standards call for acronyms such as SWF
and SWC to never be mixed case.
> - Gordon

View raw message