Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of aharui@adobe.com designates
 64.18.1.23 as permitted sender)
From: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com>
To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>,
        "jeffry@dot-com-it.com" <jeffry@dot-com-it.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 10:07:55 -0700
Subject: Re: Package com.sun.image.* not Found when building Flex Source RC3
Thread-Topic: Package com.sun.image.* not Found when building Flex Source RC3
Thread-Index: Ac1h4ot2jMG6lV3vTZa6uim8NG2MfAAAKo9f
Message-ID: <CC26F57B.42E52%aharui@adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: <5001A629.1000405@dot-com-it.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.11.0.110726
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0


>> The paragraph is attempting to say "any version of 1.5 greater than 0_13=
 or
>> 1.6".  1.7 is not supported.
>=20
>   Understood [now].  Should we make that more overt and explicitly state
> that 1.7 is not supported?  Or am I the only one who is going to make
> that mistake?
Feel free to change the paragraph.  I don't think it is worth re-kitting an=
d
starting the vote all over again, but if something else comes up and forces
a re-kit then it will be there.

We plan to put some release notes on the wiki and can also put it there.

--=20
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui