Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82260998B for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 14:36:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53614 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2012 14:36:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 53143 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2012 14:36:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 53115 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2012 14:36:12 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 14:36:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-wi0-f177.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username bdelacretaz, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 14:36:12 +0000 Received: by wibhm11 with SMTP id hm11so519437wib.0 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 07:36:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.96.3 with SMTP id do3mr3226116wib.5.1342190170393; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 07:36:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.168.136 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 07:36:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:36:10 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex 4.8.0 - RC3 - build number 1359417 (and Flex has been trademark signed off by Adobe for donation to Apache) From: Bertrand Delacretaz To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Carol Frampton wrote: > ...Please make sure you are voting on Release > Candidate 3 not Release Candidate 2. +1 for the RC3 release, see below for details of what I checked. I haven't tried building, as an incubation mentor I don't care about the technical quality of the release, I'll trust Flex PPMC members to check that. Open questions that do not affect my vote for this first release: 1) I understand Flex requires a number of external dependencies to build, do we have an exact list somewhere to establish that the licenses of all required and optional dependencies are compatible? The requirements are slightly different for required and optional, see http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html 2) I don't think my question about how ./frameworks/projects/flash-integration/FLA/ContentHolder.fla can be proven harmless [1] has been answered. Thanks for preparing the release! -Bertrand [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-flex-dev/201207.mbox/%3CCAEWfVJ%3DaFs6Mv_Cv_28mMH%3DgsNq6YTMYJjyr3oMB7RzGNMTrmg%40mail.gmail.com%3E Here's what I checked: Checked only the *-src-* files, not what's under binaries or docs at http://people.apache.org/~cframpton/ApacheFlexRC/release_candidate_3/ MD5 (apache-flex-sdk-4.8.0-incubating-src.tar.gz) = 270918333da65e70e90accb005ede1f7 MD5 (apache-flex-sdk-4.8.0-incubating-src.zip) = 0ad59abd7703fcbfc8a3ad9f51c9bd9e Signatures and digests match, release manager(s) should get their key signed at the next opportunity. The contents of the .zip and .tar.gz archives are identical (with an extra apache-flex-sdk-4.8.0-incubating-src path in the tar.gz file, not a problem). DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE are present, contents look good to me. The rat exclusions in build.xml look ok, rat report attached to FLEX-33132 looks good to me.