flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex 4.8.0 - RC3 - build number 1359417 (and Flex has been trademark signed off by Adobe for donation to Apache)
Date Fri, 13 Jul 2012 14:36:10 GMT
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Carol Frampton <cframpto@adobe.com> wrote:
> ...Please make sure you are voting on Release
> Candidate 3 not Release Candidate 2.

+1 for the RC3 release, see below for details of what I checked.

I haven't tried building, as an incubation mentor I don't care about
the technical quality of the release, I'll trust Flex PPMC members to
check that.

Open questions that do not affect my vote for this first release:

1) I understand Flex requires a number of external dependencies to
build, do we have an exact list somewhere to establish that the
licenses of all required and optional dependencies are compatible? The
requirements are slightly different for required and optional, see

2) I don't think my question about how
./frameworks/projects/flash-integration/FLA/ContentHolder.fla can be
proven harmless [1] has been answered.

Thanks for preparing the release!

[1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-flex-dev/201207.mbox/%3CCAEWfVJ%3DaFs6Mv_Cv_28mMH%3DgsNq6YTMYJjyr3oMB7RzGNMTrmg%40mail.gmail.com%3E

Here's what I checked:
Checked only the *-src-* files, not what's under binaries or docs at

MD5 (apache-flex-sdk-4.8.0-incubating-src.tar.gz) =
MD5 (apache-flex-sdk-4.8.0-incubating-src.zip) =

Signatures and digests match, release manager(s) should get their key
signed at the next opportunity.

The contents of the .zip and .tar.gz archives are identical (with an
extra apache-flex-sdk-4.8.0-incubating-src path in the tar.gz file,
not a problem).

DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE are present, contents look good to me.

The rat exclusions in build.xml look ok, rat report attached to
FLEX-33132 looks good to me.

View raw message