Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE98C9232 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:03:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 367 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2012 14:03:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 329 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2012 14:03:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 321 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2012 14:03:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:03:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of superabe@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.175] (HELO mail-yx0-f175.google.com) (209.85.213.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:03:10 +0000 Received: by yenl13 with SMTP id l13so3460027yen.6 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 07:02:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=+bl9qBPZkvxwUQV02fQPM7W6469b5wxLq+xHzVTbtn0=; b=pgxl2bkEZR1c9oIAQ2e0A+sX2T50YWdAp17ZXSMiyQFY833Tcj80Ku8aQt76p319u3 77I5Iy85QIB1/1Hy7NGaqcp65ynlkagC6Lj7WHk0sDLFnVeOMaCaQZUZ+Ko9f7lQN52Z GCFb3yKxX9EfsfHxgcFca0qZZn48mNukJkuD0MD+eDj9sLk1wag29ZL6ofvFMadERyAB t53i9Qm8cqPYBluQWn5bEK8Gvw4XE+8sWlFpHc3T2ZPkEw6qwWKApWjyLIkbG5Ty7eS0 1ePJcl7y5hykg3LTQCFP10uPodqA9z6SAHfUulS45zqG7pSuGcQ8HCOkW23Mx3M7UA0W HJCA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.217.199 with SMTP id pa7mr8417836igc.17.1340028169901; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 07:02:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.35.205 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 07:02:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:02:49 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: anyone use Flex Component Kit for Flash? From: superabe superabe To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae93411010e593c04c2bf9f32 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --14dae93411010e593c04c2bf9f32 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Yes. I use this heavily. It's an absolute essential part of my workflow when creating Flex apps, that have a very high bar for the UX, especially when the UX involves detailed animations. - superabe On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Cortlandt Winters wrote: > Yes. It used to be fairly clunky and very error prone, probably from the > two using different compilers by default that could easily get out of synch > with so many sdk versions out there (or at least that is my initial guess > as to why), but at least as of Flash cs5.5 and flex 4.6 it has become > pretty nice and a core part of my workflow. I can't imagine doing either > flex or flash development without doing it just as David describes here. > It's much easier, more efficient and natural than breaking things up into > pieces and then importing and reassembling them in flex. > > Without catalyst and with design mode going away, I'd bet that this is the > most popular method for bringing complex visuals into flex. Expanding on > these capabilities to make exporting flex themes easier is probably the > best feature that the flash ide could focus on in their next release imho. > > I recenty showed a friend how to do it and though there were a lot of > little mysterious finicky steps to make sure things were exported correctly > and using the correct package names the first time, once it worked, he was > pretty excited about how simple and repeatable the process was in the end. > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:05 PM, David Coleman < > david_coleman_007@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I recently oversaw development of a game that heavily used > fla->swc->flex. > > Lots of fancy animations and stuff were done in an FLA, then exported to > > an SWC with class names etc... and then a Flex4.6 app was wrapped around > > them providing application logic, and facebook integration. Don't know > if > > this is relevant to you, but the game was released recently (has a ton of > > users) and is: https://apps.facebook.com/houseoffun/ > > > > It's not common in my experience, but it is a path that *is* taken often > > enough to be of mention. > > > > -Dave > > > > > From: cframpto@adobe.com > > > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > > > Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 08:17:04 -0700 > > > Subject: anyone use Flex Component Kit for Flash? > > > > > > Does anyone use the the flash/flex integration feature (aka the Flex > > Component Kit for Flash) that allows you to create components with Adobe > > Flash Professional and export them for use with Flex? > > > > > > See > > > http://help.adobe.com/en_US/FlashPlatform/reference/actionscript/3/mx/flash/UIMovieClip.html > > > > > > Pre-Flex 4 the Flex Component Kit for Flash was available as a separate > > download but Flex 4 shipped with it in > > frameworks/projects/flash-integration. Unfortunately there are binaries > in > > this directory. > > > > > > Carol > > > > > --14dae93411010e593c04c2bf9f32--