Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82F869860 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 05:13:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45912 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2012 05:13:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 45868 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2012 05:13:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 45834 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2012 05:13:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 05:13:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sathyamoorthi.10@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.47] (HELO mail-pb0-f47.google.com) (209.85.160.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 05:13:22 +0000 Received: by pbbrq2 with SMTP id rq2so7247028pbb.6 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:13:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ML/9spOq6k1K7MsPNuzD8Nf3HtzuiardMhulL25H+00=; b=WO4FTHujH/95Q8OkMcoSHz6UH/wDPaJw6Lhazn76bU7PyxTJMk0CTrYO/J6OPyJ96I Pu4GH7tTc5/tMuanymTw88HGK1q28wAw4q5N6I6nUGI/namZ3qBTctjZFeGV/5BUnJXw OflEWzIr9yPcgLFyX+iQdZkSN6dLEH/g8W44y7C8DbQPC9OGZ6uqpsRoxrsS6Dm5zIIQ 49HhOYA5iG6kFZy++Y7arxoTRpQTNMjyig4ynBor2yR8lDv1/2HRQVBjtbmLuLQNo4BO KP2C7nmTXSGabFcr39j4lAe0Z6rpjEgyYKGNaIqVEdL+Ry625Z5UNeNshnIT4pp8dQTZ B1Tw== Received: by 10.68.232.161 with SMTP id tp1mr48139157pbc.44.1340687581021; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:13:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.5.30] ([122.174.127.223]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id os3sm10708059pbb.41.2012.06.25.22.12.59 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:13:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FE944DB.8010800@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:42:59 +0530 From: sathyamoorthi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [OT] HTML and Flex layouts References: <19E8FF9A-B1BF-4584-8809-FAFF34D672A8@classsoftware.com> <09B8348A-1CFB-401C-AAAE-645161D023FC@petermolgaard.com> <4FE4BC31.8020005@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 6/25/2012 11:49 PM, jude wrote: > In regards to the frequent questions of HTML and Flex and other topics, > some more OT than others, some of these questions have been asked before > but the answer then may be different than the answer now. In that case, > instead of closing someone down, may I suggest we don't respond (let the > conversation end naturally)? If no one responds to these (mentioning they > are off topic) then there is no traffic except for the initial post. If > people on this list do respond to an off topic post, then it has some merit > to them. > Yes. It really reduced my passion towards this forum. I decided to watch it as spectator. No more off-topic questions....