flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "christofer.dutz@c-ware.de" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
Subject AW: AW: Distinguishing Adobe from Apache SDKs?
Date Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:24:18 GMT

well the work Adobe would need seems to be minimal. We would at least need them to deploy
their playerglobal and airglobal swcs to maven central. I think Apache could volunteer to
do that for them :-) I doubt uploading Binaries of the FlashPlayer and Air runntime for the
multiple different operating systems is something that has to be done. I'm currently absolutely
fine with deploying them in my compaines local repo.

My SDK generator currently provides this Structure for the Adobe resources:




But currently I'm deploying everything I can find in the SDKs
Every time a new Version of AIR or the Flashplayer is released it would be enough to publish
only the playerglobal and airglobal.


-----Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Juni 2012 17:07
An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Distinguishing Adobe from Apache SDKs?

On 6/27/12 12:37 AM, "christofer.dutz@c-ware.de" <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>

> The runntimes is where I think it starts getting problematic, as I 
> think we would not be allowed to deploy the playerglobal versions and 
> the flash/air runntimes in a Maven repo.
Without an agreement from Adobe, this is not allowed.  Someone can seek such an agreement,
but are there other alternatives?  How much work is it for Adobe to place things in a Maven
repo?  Is it possible for Adobe to host its own Maven repo or otherwise make it easier for
Maven to work with runtime downloads?  If you can supply the recipe, I can see if Adobe can
work with it.

Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.

View raw message