flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carol Frampton <cfram...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: AW: [MENTORS] Binary Files
Date Thu, 31 May 2012 18:03:50 GMT

On 5/31/12 1 :07PM, "Christophe Herreman" <christophe.herreman@gmail.com>

>@Carol: could someone of the original developers give us a general
>of the changes they made? We could diff the files ourselves, but it would
>take some time to actually understand what concepts were added or what
>parts of the library were changed/improved.

You can look at the svn version history for the thirdparty directories to
see the actual changes made by the Adobe devs and their log messages.
Just reading the log messages will give you an idea of the changes made.


>- Christophe
>2012/5/31 Greg Reddin <gredbug@gmail.com>
>> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:44 AM, christofer.dutz@c-ware.de
>> <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de> wrote:
>> > Ok ... but actually using the default version seems to be the better
>> way. If the originals are flawed it would be good to file bug-reports
>> the original project and help them fix those problems.
>> > If they are simply inconveniancies, I would suggest to implement
>> workarounds ... using patched jars sort of gives me a really bad
>> Especially if you could end up in Classloading version problems since we
>> don't have separate classloaders.
>> I hope our long-term goal would be to fix these issues by either
>> contributing back the changes or extending the original projects to
>> implement our changes. But the short-term goal is to get a parity
>> release out so I'd think we'd rather just release the patched version
>> with a parity release.
>> Greg
>Christophe Herreman

View raw message