Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dougarthur@gmail.com designates
 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CBAC4501.3F065%aharui@adobe.com>
References: 
 <CAO1x2tOc_ic=LuxOqiGYgBCK-6ML=a0rYcL44fL-tQHrikHt4g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CBAC4501.3F065%aharui@adobe.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:51:45 -0600
Message-ID: 
 <CAO1x2tMbgAErGX=Xi6613ttNwLjqibbQSAbCKR-gQqWx6f_icw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 360Flex, Tuesday Morning
From: Doug Arthur <dougarthur@gmail.com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/12/12 8:12 AM, "Doug Arthur" <dougarthur@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I figured as much as well, but it would have been a great delivery for
>> 360|Flex.
> Yes it would, and believe me, I tried, but I don't see how we'll make it.
>>
>> Alex,
>> Do we have any timeframe on some of the outstanding issues? This way
>> we can possibly have a target date at least for 360|Flex?
> I've given up on target dates. Also, my understanding is that there may be a
> gap in time between when we are able to run a build script and create a
> package (which I am still hoping to get done by Monday) vs getting the IPMC
> to sign off on it because it passes our tests and the Incubator's legal and
> other policy requirements.
>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>

Understood, was worth a shot.
- Doug