Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E5DA9E75 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 18:33:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64618 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2012 18:33:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 64485 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2012 18:33:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 64476 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2012 18:33:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 18:33:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of omarg.developer@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.43] (HELO mail-wg0-f43.google.com) (74.125.82.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 18:33:20 +0000 Received: by wgbdr12 with SMTP id dr12so1346485wgb.0 for ; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 11:32:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=NQ3grgPtOHBBjDFpNOtNcuZAP0Y6etl9ZmuN7BDYgHw=; b=v0tPa5JmdLTCQOM2BnW7E7c0tnf4Eb0u/XD7gUJJQS/vaDkvF1MyLbvWYYhfD4UFwX GuKEexz5FPF+TfTi0vmYftYy1YuwLOPHaa4x+tjz3p0EWZcQujighhtX4c9fxpFrMlsc 7BFkQnQkKzZ4EHtbocJ5QOKjzQbZlHJj51pwfXRaCs9b7fa9ZlDW42UojwV3v6+URq50 6NmUlTjH6Gt/6R6VGRVnb9Ic/HGxR0I7Ssc1OZVe7u8iK8gymEb40J9IhIUZgJ7u4UgX z1iv5Ie8EmxQh2LwDeGOHSGOgnfOzAtECLCwH4UdY/h7FZ0fsWJdIFaYa2r16luedMpU OXmA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.135.206 with SMTP id u56mr2339396wei.29.1333650779166; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 11:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.5.5 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 11:32:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1333609450.67573.YahooMailNeo@web130106.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <0AED1687-C22E-42D3-9A1B-541774C646AC@gmail.com> <4F7D805F.8040708@leichtgewicht.at> Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 11:32:59 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: flex breakdown From: Omar Gonzalez To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6de006cf2593204bcf2c485 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6de006cf2593204bcf2c485 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Left Right wrote: > > > > And does anyone know what percentage of developers use FlashDevelop? I, > for > > one, have never even seen their home page, let alone used or downloaded > it. > > Nor do I believe that any polls on any such boards that you didn't > mention > > really matter either. All of these boards will have only a percentage of > > Flex and AS3 users, a percentage that is impossible for anyone to > > determine. I imagine this is why the Apache saying exists: "If it didn't > > happen in the mailing list, it didn't happen.". > > > > -omar > > > > I'm sorry, but there isn't a better way - you would need to select a group > of users and poll them. If you have a better idea of how to poll all users - I'm all ears. Yes there is a better way, for this project really the only way, and that is to ask questions on the mailing list and see how this community feels about a certain question or issue. > If you never heard of a single oldest open-source editor > for AS3, I am rather surprised about why are you putting this forward as an > advantage, or something you would want to show off... and how this makes > the poll less credible. > Again, you're putting words in my mouth. I did not say I have never heard of FlashDevelop, I _did_ say that I have never downloaded it or visited their homepage because I do not care for this editor because a.) I'm on Mac and b.) I use IntelliJ. > > Again, I didn't say that either sources or other parts of the SDK are > useless, what I say is that people don't use them quite often. Some - never > use them. This is a common sense, that if a feature is not mandatory - make > it explicitly optional... It doesn't matter how good uses you can find for > the things in the SDK. The goal _is not_ to provide users with as much > stuff as you can. The purpose is to give them what they really need and be > flexible about giving per request. > > Best. > > Oleg > I understand your point, and I agree with some of it and I agree with the points Doug McCune made. All I am saying is let's not use assumptions and conjecture, instead let's use this mailing list for what it is intended for, and that is to communicate with the community and formulate consensus about issues regarding this project. Polls are inaccurate, incomplete, unsecure (there are ways to vote multiple times on any poll), and again, polling should be done on the mailing list because "if it doesn't happen on the mailing list, it didn't happen.". -omar --0016e6de006cf2593204bcf2c485--