Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of aharui@adobe.com designates
 64.18.1.23 as permitted sender)
From: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com>
To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 09:17:28 -0800
Subject: Re: [OT] Thoughts on a Apache Flex MVC Framework
Thread-Topic: [OT] Thoughts on a Apache Flex MVC Framework
Thread-Index: Acz3zmhkIcTYK2ZfRzqMLsYX7NEb5AAAMUSv
Message-ID: <CB74EF28.3CF90%aharui@adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAKPa920vN_pmqn1JyUO1hGZxW1zsHYMFa3S7nAX88S3YoKJSiA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.11.0.110726
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0


On 3/1/12 9:11 AM, "Jaros=B3aw Szczepankiewicz" <jszczepankiewicz@gmail.com=
>
wrote:

> what's the purpose? sharing mailing lists? sharing repository? sharing
> documentation? apart from that why framework Parsley, not Matte or
> something else? How this will affect releasing new edition of flex
> sdk? Will we wait with release of 4.9 sdk for bugfixing in library X?
>=20
The purpose is to make code available for modification under the Apache way
that wouldn't be available otherwise.  It is supposedly possible for the
different code bases to have different/separate release.

--=20
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui