Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F1FC695FB for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:38:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31864 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2012 16:38:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 31825 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2012 16:38:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 31817 invoked by uid 99); 26 Mar 2012 16:38:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:38:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of olegsivokon@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.175] (HELO mail-yx0-f175.google.com) (209.85.213.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:38:19 +0000 Received: by yenm3 with SMTP id m3so3906500yen.6 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:37:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=TtXLWa4coxT+xsXV5tJzvcss24wvU879E0bOiqu1vfc=; b=kr/vauLs3Pw2boOmOG9LmAxuwIl4dJFVTZQkq6meJNj6ZTKnYln/U6dcGLRPKMeD1l iuS+DmE7sDPTRTrtTfCNhFrJ6nLy/Pph4UUf6xBE1pG4bSKBDkdzmcBsYKUuSoYbBUT6 hcfjPZMjPE269y8ETTQWJXMHays/RYod1w5KODgTyGqv1ay7OgW5HVWqYiOXC1M4SKyJ jj8+syRA+5HeLHtfZEUCxZ7bGsoOUMAratuZF32ODqvWZ8+7Jc+7SPAamhnJ3/Gh3Vhc KnSv5Bjo9XIEWgsltcKbZy0hkP+6XCGPAm5ygFRCqpuaWpaR8wOXS2gt9dYXzt7I0iq8 VK3A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.190.197 with SMTP id gs5mr6261848igc.59.1332779878702; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:37:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.134.136 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:37:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4F6BB7E0.3030202@thedevprocess.com> <4F6E1578.8070606@thedevprocess.com> <52B2F252-22C7-4375-BE97-50B8B75F0A3F@classsoftware.com> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:37:58 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Actionscript workers and async locking? From: Left Right To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0447870f3bde0f04bc27ff5a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d0447870f3bde0f04bc27ff5a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 This thread is heavily OT anyway, because nor the threading, neither architecture frameworks are anywhere near the purpose of the project :) Well, I cannot force better choices on anyone... I tried to be a vicar in my life, no, seriously I did! I know how tough it may get... Besides, i didn't say that Parsley is absolutely useless, if you look at it from the financial point of view, it actually helps allocating more working hours to the project => more funding => better salary / more people get employed. And I'm the last person to tell someone to work less and be paid less! Just to make clear one aspect: I told that I would be happier with the Erlang process/signals (now read attentively:) because it is similar in principle to how Flash events work. But then again, no one is going to ask me or even consider my opinion on the subject, so this isn't even a speculation, it's more like romance/fiction novel :) Best. Oleg --f46d0447870f3bde0f04bc27ff5a--