Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A331A9118 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 07:00:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45264 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2012 07:00:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 44884 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2012 07:00:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 44737 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2012 07:00:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 07:00:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of omarg.developer@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.175] (HELO mail-wi0-f175.google.com) (209.85.212.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 07:00:36 +0000 Received: by wibhq12 with SMTP id hq12so2531219wib.6 for ; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 23:00:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=2ZgVukvvaOMpvjPfM6N5i8NlTnBsYoBVMui6U0Tj9i8=; b=O0QTQxQZyzhaVPt5BQN6+61TxRKExisBWJcaNjbW64i+XLs1BJkR3H/X+fhoRznird kvnCg/yEbFtnCecnNRPCt5M1AOHHM95xBt3nWrSml5pBjLmRQRzm4S6OO8eT927/vCvf kbIQQWcZbNgLwZIXO+2ghu1e1d1CxzwuH0yZWAvkh41kDp02m0x53wYDTeUtyVEq7xah yB1UG3QCZvxGzz/tRcPEdm34fWTNWDLQ2f7L4dLijzRxM/oc9n7c7I955uu8tvLXZmRR X5/n9yrMa2V7PJ7AVMsZCl5THvJc4lTZExazl82+3Ff1Ip4OsVEw9ZKkMJck10HDFaXe FEAQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.99.65 with SMTP id eo1mr16597492wib.13.1331017216588; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 23:00:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.98.194 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 23:00:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <81652D40-1476-44FE-A8EA-45E846D6AB66@classsoftware.com> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 23:00:16 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: mx PostCode validator class From: Omar Gonzalez To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04428e5e627ac104ba8d980c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d04428e5e627ac104ba8d980c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > So as far as I can see there's not much point in using spark/flash.globalisation style validators or formatters for postcodes. Anyone think differently? > Yea, what about localizing the error messages. -- Omar Gonzalez s9tpepper@apache.org Apache Flex PPMC Member --f46d04428e5e627ac104ba8d980c--