Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9875B954B for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:03:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81975 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2012 12:03:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 81848 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2012 12:03:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 81839 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2012 12:03:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:03:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jamesmcowan@googlemail.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.47] (HELO mail-bk0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:03:29 +0000 Received: by bkcjg15 with SMTP id jg15so2725819bkc.6 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 05:03:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jO5ex2NjoknE/s13ZlffpT/fsWugLVTd9V5nRj+9gY8=; b=bI929Vaad6emYI7UShf8WvTSkvRsA0du00hSqH2XrPL5dUYkJHaN8I76diZQvNENq/ TvDBNnMhRuafbS2QTfPyWiEmKOPTjj28t0gSO3nRoYtgj5Y0/5YkM190jjfnR6WjBTNw M2h2Ca9oxd2nwMHoyuj1vdtPEZmFwVnElDmNdSfz2y1jm5Qu6VGUIo4xDvMhoT4+ywIi TXkk6RVChW8zRMxrkWMd5qbt6S+VpvHuFZvbGdLNvA65MPHTyyQpleyQ5qFFRUekd54W cYUnDOzWZHF6XHC2J57OKPHdaadtxlEiz1yqZH2a/gXdj884sP9eJKqGxMc/TU1t4An9 EG9w== Received: by 10.205.139.67 with SMTP id iv3mr4807849bkc.8.1331553789151; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 05:03:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.20] (host81-159-83-148.range81-159.btcentralplus.com. [81.159.83.148]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u14sm24818639bkp.2.2012.03.12.05.03.07 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 05:03:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F5DE5FA.8070601@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:03:06 +0000 From: James Cowan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Haxe and Flex References: <4F5B191F.1070704@leichtgewicht.at> <4F5B719D.5020305@leichtgewicht.at> <4F5B73DB.5030309@leichtgewicht.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This has probably been discussed before but I was wondering what the conclusion/response to the suggestion of linking Haxe with Flex was: http://ncannasse.fr/blog/open_letter_to_flex_community Is it actually possible to link Haxe and Flex? This tutorial (http://haxe.org/doc/flash/flex) is very out of date. Perhaps if anyone else is interested, they could drop me an email and we could have a (skype) chat? James