From flex-dev-return-6128-apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Wed Mar 7 19:27:38 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 73BCD9080 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 19:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5675 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2012 19:27:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 5489 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2012 19:27:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 5480 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2012 19:27:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 19:27:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.63.181.70] (HELO mail.controlserveronline.com) (66.63.181.70) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 19:27:29 +0000 Received: by mail.controlserveronline.com via HTTP; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:26:06 -0800 From: "Rui Silva" To: Subject: re: [PROPOSAL] html template Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:26:06 -0800 Reply-To: flex@rduartes.net Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [195.23.102.124] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Igor, what you really mean is wrap or wrapper, isn't it? Evolving the HTML template is a good idea, I think and keeping it in sync w= ith current trends does show how much we respect the web standards. However= , I'm not sure about the rest of the group, but I've never used the generat= ed HTML in final production. I always take the generated swf(s) and use my = own HTML templates (which usually include a bunch of other stuff not really= related to the Flex app). Rui -------- Original Message -------- > From: "Igor Costa" > Sent: quarta-feira, 7 de Mar=E7o de 2012 19:06 > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [PROPOSAL] html template > > One of aspect that didn't like too much on the SDK by default is > the ability to warp the swf in a swf Object manner . > > Fact is if you want to write up your own, you have to digg into template > and make it clear by it owns. > > Which leads that you will produce by default a simpler html warp and we > need a little bit more to make easy to manipulate the world around SWF. > > Currently we have XHTML file with DTD that hits 98%. > > Why not substitute the to HTML 5 syntax format, once we have the benefit = of > utf-8 by default and some missing other tags. > > Also, an API that can make more easy to write external functions . > Including for example JQuery library to manipulate HTML > using the Google CDN host like most bootstraps does today. > > What are you guys mentors, contributors, committter thinks on a better wa= rp.