flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Left Right <olegsivo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Actionscript workers and async locking?
Date Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:20:03 GMT
> Parsley also supports this stuff. Parsley 3.0 is especially nice as
> instead of being dependent on tasks (which the previous version relied on),
> you can re-use you standard Parsley commands.

Sorry, this may be more typical of C/C++ people, but it's almost a subject
worth an xkcd comic... Every time I hear the word "standard" I expect it to
be followed by ISO / ASCII / ISBN or similar set of capital roman letters
and a number. :) Parsley is not a standard and it's commands are no more
standards then my five spoons of sugar I put into my espresso cup.

In order to continue in the spirit of xkcd and standards compliance,
there's this RFC-1925 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1925 paragraph 6a that
states that:

It is always possible to add another level of indirection.

This is the only RFC or standard that Parsley follows most fully and

Sorry, unforgettable personal experience with this particular piece of
software made me post this comment. I apologize beforehand for any such or
similar experiences caused by the comment! :)



  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message