Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F4549FEC for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 18:15:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44022 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2012 18:15:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 43943 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2012 18:15:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 43935 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2012 18:15:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 18:15:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dougarthur@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.175] (HELO mail-we0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 18:15:18 +0000 Received: by werc1 with SMTP id c1so2160485wer.6 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:14:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=VAEnNrkZo1T/6tocnW3xzkBUdjACxupBkBhvdgAz6FM=; b=n72pkWsLlxZ0ipJUYBLu225mRD0Rx+P+7ychMhMIBkIpq0BM1bZtgSGqmNVUTOoPGY MEzoRt6eYxcnCcAuOV36X60S+gHt8D6gikNi2szuu2R5IFuTm1sDrjuDlXFfYyQTtfE/ txh6dS3PCr9X5bZlOM0lJz1l09WDPBOPwKzlE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.97.196 with SMTP id ec4mr5487897wib.11.1329502497992; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:14:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.95.100 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:14:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <92AAB892-A186-42B9-9515-F85E21E226B1@realeyes.com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 11:14:57 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [LAZY] Re: DECISION message tag is confusing IMO From: Doug Arthur To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:53 AM, Giorgio Natili wrote: > >> >>I agree with Bertrand. I propose we remove the [DECISION] marker in favor >>of having a [LAZY] marker to handle lazy consensus: >>http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus >> >>Main reason, is ability to skim the ML when you're busy and look for >>either [VOTE] or [LAZY] >> >>Anyone oppose? If not I can make the change after the 72 hours have >>passed. (I need some practice updating the wiki anyway) > > > + 1 + 1