Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D25B92F3 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:35:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40039 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2012 14:35:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 40004 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2012 14:35:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 39995 invoked by uid 99); 16 Feb 2012 14:35:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:35:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of haykelbj@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.47] (HELO mail-pz0-f47.google.com) (209.85.210.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:35:47 +0000 Received: by daln34 with SMTP id n34so1789568dal.6 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 06:35:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=p+LupVhIGg5BAfuLztlG1/OpZw4vwykMu7FXih4F78I=; b=EvG2EfGWTI+ycBJMD/zsxEaHTv+6nJ6dr38toORWijbUUkm2+3fvgrQ40XJifhp8mU p01Ipp82xK4VvSC3810054GxwK8kyI7KlcGJbVqNyoSAbvnuInIHVrnNQNGFB/x1XwLv l/LeXaCQU1bTQGhqiNCXutpIdCLe/sTLxwg44= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.220.41 with SMTP id pt9mr7715886pbc.87.1329402927111; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 06:35:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.218.136 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 06:35:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:35:27 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: asdoc comments for flash player and SDK version numbers From: Haykel BEN JEMIA To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ffba1bb3bdd9004b915bd87 --e89a8ffba1bb3bdd9004b915bd87 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Personally I never write detailed documentation while developing. I generally write a short description and the detailed documentation is either written by someone else or in another documentation pass, which can be done in other files. I have suggested stub classes in an earlier e-mail because I think this could be useful also for IDEs. They would not require the whole source code for auto-completion, documentation etc. Haykel On 16 February 2012 14:41, Carol Frampton wrote: > I am totally against stripping out the asdoc. Who do you think writes the > asdoc? We do. It is just as important as the code. If you strip it out > it won't be kept current. It should be part of any code review. > > Carol > > On 2/16/12 4 :15AM, "Omar Gonzalez" wrote: > > >> > >> Perhaps a script to strip out all comments and a way to create patches > >> ignoring missing comments would be useful? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Justin > > > > > >I'm not quire sure what you mean. The ideal solution would be to figure > >out > >a way to keep comments in such a way that the during development they're > >not in our files but at release or at patch submission the proper > >documentation is there. > > > >-- > >Omar Gonzalez > >s9tpepper@apache.org > > --e89a8ffba1bb3bdd9004b915bd87--