Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B69959833 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 23:03:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83548 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2012 23:03:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 83468 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2012 23:03:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 83460 invoked by uid 99); 9 Feb 2012 23:03:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:03:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of davidbuhler@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.175] (HELO mail-yx0-f175.google.com) (209.85.213.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:03:27 +0000 Received: by yenr5 with SMTP id r5so1218624yen.6 for ; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:03:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ousDl1gH+zyH7h16zm/yHL7gTq8u3osW/Ho+q6TLDJI=; b=a9X0gLTRoI1uIN2jAJ/g5Md4+I0TpHWCJgje+AsSr3E2x2p6y6nrohNr/BilxJNFyO MGyWBPiekqUiQqrl6yW9fnyMfMAUfTcUwpsjrmttgwnJHWgeK3nvr/mrFB75a9K8uYul MSnYelMWeCTp24GJCWrolMlBV62XiakckYCgs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.178.73 with SMTP id cw9mr6885932igc.23.1328828586146; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:03:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.187.164 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 15:03:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4F34036F.7090302@leichtgewicht.at> <4F34092B.9030607@leichtgewicht.at> <4F340F32.50004@leichtgewicht.at> <4F3422BD.7030400@leichtgewicht.at> Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 18:03:06 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RT] Recommendation Unit-Test System? From: David Francis Buhler To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I worked for a company that did a large comparison effort for functional-testing tools. We liked SilkTest and ended up purchasing licenses and using it with good success. http://www.microfocus.com/products/silk/silktest/ On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Tink wrote: > If done a fair amount of Automation with http://www.riatest.com/ and > instrumentation of custom components. > > Tink > > > > On 9 Feb 2012, at 19:47, Martin Heidegger wrote: > >> Awesome! FlexUnit for Apache Flex! Sounds nice to me! >> >> By the way: Are any of you using other testing tools beside a unit testing >> suite and mock tests? VIsual testing (pixel comparsion?) >> or so? Just out of curiosity. >> >> yours >> Martin. > >