Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B661E97C6 for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 03:57:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77307 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2012 03:57:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 77269 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2012 03:57:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 77256 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2012 03:57:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 03:57:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of omarg.developer@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.175] (HELO mail-we0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 03:57:42 +0000 Received: by werc1 with SMTP id c1so2751410wer.6 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 19:57:22 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of omarg.developer@gmail.com designates 10.180.85.105 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.85.105; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of omarg.developer@gmail.com designates 10.180.85.105 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=omarg.developer@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=omarg.developer@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.85.105]) by 10.180.85.105 with SMTP id g9mr8712642wiz.12.1329623842802 (num_hops = 1); Sat, 18 Feb 2012 19:57:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=0OauGI8SG4F82wBUJW3nWPcgEFcHaErDAi4TBzLWiuY=; b=pbftn2I/gbSheR+qyBR12ZomwLz2uVxJpA7HvMkpaLxP+jLXwUT4BzTCnzwWexAZw5 nQAQKiqu3uEQsVsOVXppS2AHdoMMf5ths/W2i7uimbZYESgBhYW6PKy3ma5yIhSDQmGS dyxDit7CYVPsQbX9Ge+tD4Jsc54u2P+a2EnwE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.85.105 with SMTP id g9mr7377111wiz.12.1329623842753; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 19:57:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.8.138 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 19:57:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <712C8555-E02B-44BB-8F9F-5AE1084BEF3C@classsoftware.com> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 19:57:22 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to check out and compile Apache Flex SDK in Flash Builder From: Omar Gonzalez To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0435c20ad50de804b9492c9d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d0435c20ad50de804b9492c9d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Michael A. Labriola < labriola@digitalprimates.net> wrote: > > >The mentors responded in another thread that binaries required to make > builds are fine so for example compc/mxmlc or requires SWCs are fine to > have in SVN as long as the binaries have the right licenses. > > Which might be a problem. From my recollection of fighting this with > spoon, much of the compiler code is under the Adobe license, not the MPL, > so I am not sure how that will play out here. > > Mike > > Can we just make the build script download the required compilers, etc? The issue is basically hosting in our repo and redistributing if the license is not compatible so that should solve our problem right? -- Omar Gonzalez s9tpepper@apache.org --f46d0435c20ad50de804b9492c9d--