Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A76709EA4 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 11:57:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59586 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2012 11:57:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 59548 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2012 11:57:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 59540 invoked by uid 99); 3 Feb 2012 11:57:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:57:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.175] (HELO mail-tul01m020-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:56:57 +0000 Received: by obhx4 with SMTP id x4so4619742obh.6 for ; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 03:56:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.38.70 with SMTP id e6mr6385070obk.13.1328270196617; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 03:56:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.44.132 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 03:56:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 11:56:36 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: will ever adobe give the flashplayer to the opensource comunity From: filippo dipisa To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044632863c335b04b80e0155 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d044632863c335b04b80e0155 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Many thanks. Do you know if anyone started to think about a new runtime for actionscript or flex not dependant to Adobe or FP and opensource? 2012/2/3 Jo=E3o Fernandes > On 3 February 2012 11:39, filippo dipisa wrote: > > > Hi, > > I'm new to the list and wondering if you have ever discuss how to manag= e > > the fact that Flex is opensource but the Flashplayer isn't ( for my > > knowledge ) > > All the others apache project are full opensource and with full control= , > so > > how this is going to work? > > What's happen if we think that we need to add a new feature to the > > flashplayer like the multithreading support for example, or something > that > > needs to be fixed or uptated to the buggy flashplayer? > > I know that Adobe at the beginning has a team dedicated to this > transition, > > but what about the future? > > Do we have always to relate to Adobe for any Flashplayer request? > > Thanks for any clarification. > > Filippo > > > > Flash player is closed source and will always be so yes, Flex will always > depend on FP till some solution is found to output to another format > besides SWF. > > Regarding multi-threading is known that in a near future (mid 2012) it wi= ll > be part of Flash Player. Regarding bugs, there is a JIRA project at > http://bugs.adobe.com/flashplayer/ > > > -- > > Jo=E3o Fernandes > --f46d044632863c335b04b80e0155--