Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
From: "Rui Silva" <flex@rduartes.net>
To: <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [Discuss] Logo Choices
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 09:14:47 -0800
Reply-To: flex@rduartes.net
Message-ID: <634d6772$1613775e$47ad145a$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Agreed. I wonder if we'll have this depth of discussion when we get to the =
interesting bits about code and  framework?

-------- Original Message --------
> From: "Jo=E3o Saleiro" <joao.saleiro@webfuel.pt>
> Sent: sexta-feira, 3 de Fevereiro de 2012 15:55
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Discuss] Logo Choices
> 
> I like any version of the logo as long as it is reasonable (and they all 
> are) and I don't really care it makes me remember X, or Y, or whatever, 
> because anything you create today makes you remember something else that 
> already exists. So this can turn into a never-ending discussion that 
> will lead nowhere.
> 
> I know that the logo is important, but why don't we stop trying to make 
> it perfect and just move ahead with what we got? With so many things to 
> do, and we're wasting so much energy in something that is actually not 
> that important. I can imagine many people here are already very tired of 
> this logo discussion. Let's just remember that we're dragging this 
> discussion for at least two weeks...
> 
> We are going to have many other discussions on the future. For this 
> community to work, before hitting the send button people have to think 
> twice and evaluate whether the email they're sending is really valuable 
> or if it's only going to create more noise and discussion. Why don't we 
> focus on the next steps ?
> 
> Jo=E3o Saleiro