Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A794190FE for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2012 18:49:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95745 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2012 18:49:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 95655 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2012 18:49:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 95646 invoked by uid 99); 4 Feb 2012 18:49:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 18:49:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.175] (HELO mail-qy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.216.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 18:49:13 +0000 Received: by qcso7 with SMTP id o7so2550756qcs.6 for ; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 10:48:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.135.135 with SMTP id n7mr4543499qct.31.1328381331509; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 10:48:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.30] (adsl-69-183-115-182.adsl.snet.net. [69.183.115.182]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fi8sm21498122qab.21.2012.02.04.10.48.50 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 04 Feb 2012 10:48:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F2D7D8A.1060306@dot-com-it.com> Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 13:48:42 -0500 From: Jeffry Houser Reply-To: jeffry@dot-com-it.com Organization: DotComIt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org CC: Doug McCune Subject: Re: [Discussion] [Discussion] References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 2/4/2012 1:39 PM, Doug McCune wrote: > Is it really necessary to subject-tag any [Discussion] thread? Aren't all > threads, unless otherwise specified, discussion threads? If you don't > include the [Discussion] subject-tag are we assuming it's not a discussion > and not a vote, so therefore it's... what? I've gotten in the habit of changing the 'vote' to discussion if I respond to a vote thread where a discussion has started. Beyond that I haven't been paying attention. -- Jeffry Houser Technical Entrepreneur 203-379-0773 -- http://www.flextras.com?c=104 UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready! -- http://www.theflexshow.com http://www.jeffryhouser.com http://www.asktheflexpert.com -- Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust