> In
> my company we keep using Flex 3, we didn't even switch to 4, cause it
> isn't really worth the effort (IMHO).

Oops. It was worth it.

Ariel Jakobovits
ajakobov@adobe.com
650-350-0282

On Feb 7, 2012, at 5:23 AM, Piotr Kawiak <piotr.kawiak@gmail.com> wrote:

> I totally agree with Alex. I am working in a large company on
> enterprise scale project with Flex GUI and I'd love 'new' Flex to be
> backwards compatible, but this sure looks like an enormous effort. In
> my company we keep using Flex 3, we didn't even switch to 4, cause it
> isn't really worth the effort (IMHO). I'd trade backwards
> compatibility for new, cleaner component architecture. If the 'core'
> stays corrupt, then I guess I'd rather keep using Flex 3.