flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Omar Gonzalez <omarg.develo...@gmail.com>
Subject RE: [gosh] Compiler choice [was Goshhawk language choices and more]
Date Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:19:05 GMT
On Feb 20, 2012 7:08 AM, "David Arno" <david@davidarno.org> wrote:
> > From: niel.drummond@googlemail.com [mailto:niel.drummond@googlemail.com]
> On Behalf Of Niel Drummond
> > Sent: 20 February 2012 07:45
> >
> > 1) Wait for falcon, projected stable release late 2012, early 2013.
> This to my mind is the most risky of your three options. We wait a year,
> then maybe get a compiler, which will be of unknown quality and usability.
> Then we'd have to start work on getting it to support MXML properly.
Just wanted to point out here that according to Gordon Smith, I believe,
the statement that we would have to deal with MXML in the compiler post
donation is incorrect as they already have built support for MXML with a
different approach than what we have in mxmlc. Im not saying its either the
right approach or 100% complete, just that it exists according to Adobe

Omar Gonzalez

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message