flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Heidegger ...@leichtgewicht.at>
Subject Re: [RT] haxe reality check
Date Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:48:43 GMT
On 23/02/2012 17:53, Left Right wrote:
> There is a confusion about the way in which E4X will not be accessible -

e4x is a language feature. Different access is per-definition not e4x. 
It just means we would
need to use other tools.

> inline function getDefinition(name) { return untyped
> __global__["flash.utils.getDefinitionByName"](name); }

Yes, it would be possible to use the functions but it would not be 
possible to provide
functions or constants that Flex users could refer to.

> However, GPL vs Apache license seems like a tough one...

As long as the things in haXe are not required to be checked in it would 
be good enough.


View raw message