flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeffry Houser <jef...@dot-com-it.com>
Subject Re: Apache Flex logo colors
Date Fri, 03 Feb 2012 03:57:27 GMT

  I have mixed feelings about the mixed logos.  I also can perceive 
situations where it'd be convenient to have a "flexible" logo.
  But, I also see the need--from a branding perspective--to choose one 
and make it consistent.  It seems--from the posts on this thread--that 
more people think the latter is more important than the former.  I can 
respect that viewpoint and am perfectly fine getting behind that.

  I never really noticed before this thread how "similar" the color 
schemes are between the Google Logo and the Windows logo.

On 2/2/2012 10:36 PM, Virat Patel wrote:
> +1 Superb!! looks very cool.
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 7:44 AM, JP Bader<jp@zavteq.com>  wrote:
>> I feel that there is a case for both the color and non-color versions.
>>   IMO, the color version makes sense for showing a richer, more complex
>> project in environments like online, marketing blips, etc., while the
>> black and white is great for letter head or other means of discussion
>> (footnote).
>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:50 PM, James Ong<yanlilei64@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> I still prefer the Web 2.0 colours, it make more sense and fresher as an
>>> brighter logo for Apache Flex.
>> --
>> JP Bader
>> Principal
>> Zavteq, Inc.
>> @lordB8r | jp@zavteq.com
>> 608.692.2468

Jeffry Houser
Technical Entrepreneur
UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready!
Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust

View raw message