Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB07C90DF for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2012 12:30:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34817 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2012 12:30:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 34773 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2012 12:29:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 34764 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jan 2012 12:29:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 12:29:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of vanelord@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.175] (HELO mail-ey0-f175.google.com) (209.85.215.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 12:29:28 +0000 Received: by eaal1 with SMTP id l1so1465541eaa.6 for ; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 04:29:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; bh=oNAQyhgafi7CXBKFCR4YmNAj2F86P7m7u865F1+Kto0=; b=HtcsHxifO+IT9WuymOo8Dd3NHMp9malMYiEk45PFrJ2OZcaLeXFN60VSTBGP0qbZwy QgD6x0+iS8Jo4RVegMrr3CssGu1tJsvdEW51zd8+XaSP2/6l5G9sppXIVjPxcyFidlyk 7uzlC+zmZlMC9LhYlGrpse2kAIEE7nHOYe2Yo= Received: by 10.213.34.17 with SMTP id j17mr1844328ebd.84.1325939346562; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 04:29:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.130] (94-75-97-163.home.aster.pl. [94.75.97.163]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 76sm261482537eeh.0.2012.01.07.04.29.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 07 Jan 2012 04:29:06 -0800 (PST) References: <49562545$49da9aec$372d7e10$@com> In-Reply-To: <49562545$49da9aec$372d7e10$@com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: Cc: "" X-Mailer: iPod Mail (9A405) From: Michal Szczepanski Subject: Re: BlazeDS Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 13:29:03 +0100 To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" -- Michal Szczepanski Flash Platform Developer www: http://blog.vane.pl Send from mobile On 7 sty 2012, at 01:33, "Rui Silva" wrote: > +1 to what Greg said. And I'd also like to say that I'd be interested in > participating in BlazeDS. > > -------- Original Message -------- >> From: "Greg Reddin" >> Sent: sexta-feira, 6 de Janeiro de 2012 23:12 >> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: BlazeDS >> >> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Alex Harui wrote: >>> Mentors, what criteria would you use to determine if Blaze should be > its own project? >> >> I would say it would be its own project if it has its own distinct >> community. The two communities can certainly overlap, but if there's a >> significant number of folks in one community, but not the other, it >> would become its own project. >> >> It's really no problem to start together, then separate at a later >> time. I suggest we cross that bridge when we come to it. >> >> Greg > >