Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 818D49D26 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 20:49:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51514 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2012 20:49:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51488 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2012 20:49:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51480 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2012 20:49:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 20:49:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rick.winscot@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.175] (HELO mail-gx0-f175.google.com) (209.85.161.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 20:49:18 +0000 Received: by ggnh1 with SMTP id h1so436821ggn.6 for ; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 12:48:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=tD8mmxSmXWzWeQ4P0UmGgYs2kz+fn+qCjHjk7Ot+a8E=; b=JRaws+gSxvhc2D8oq0p2OnI/hz8uzjxNEduaHgpCTHYo7pSBTDnAF+UFc2cJGjD9Zv k/VxoWstnwqkSWkCDXsFRmftwV7NtXE/kXgrar2u0bejA+hlYM08uyyIDVIxZmvHzi/1 81amrYmhM+3NIZUJSTOXZ71qe1KAM8j9/sFOI= Received: by 10.101.177.1 with SMTP id e1mr1698829anp.28.1325796537664; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 12:48:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from Rick-Winscots-iMac.local (h78.184.101.208.static.ip.windstream.net. [208.101.184.78]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k10sm96966273anb.22.2012.01.05.12.48.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 05 Jan 2012 12:48:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 15:48:55 -0500 From: Rick Winscot To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <54D72DB4-0191-494B-9767-1CC7EEDB5CE3@lndgrn.se> <8035CE871CBE43B9B235337C233BC642@VLopes> Subject: Re: FLEX Logo Sketch X-Mailer: sparrow 1.5 (build 1043.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="4f060cb7_7672bd23_d14f" --4f060cb7_7672bd23_d14f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Here's another... perhaps too simple? http://www.quilix.com/images/Apache_Flex_01.png Cheers, Rick Winscot On Thursday, January 5, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Arthur Lockman wrote: > Wow! I really like that. > > > -- > Arthur Lockman | Senior Developer @ Vivace > vi.vace.me (http://vi.vace.me) > Twitter: @arthurlockman > a.rthr.me (http://a.rthr.me) > > > On Thursday, January 5, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Jonathan Campos wrote: > > > > just out of practical concerns - does it look good > > > scaled down and in grayscale? > > > > > > > > > > > I really like the way it looks but I agree with peter. > > > > I've always been taught that a good logo needs to be prepared to be scaled > > up or down along with needing to be able to translate to a 2 color look. > > I'm not talking monochrome but 2 color (black/white, 2 greys, etc) or > > inverted if running on a dark background. > > > > I worry that this design is too complicated for that. > > > > Just my 2 cents. > > > > -- > > Jonathan Campos > > > > > --4f060cb7_7672bd23_d14f--